This Just In...

Should McDonald’s have tweeted about Cleveland rescue hero?

May 10, 2013

After a man named Charles Ramsey helped Amanda Berry escape from the Cleveland house where she and two other young women had been held captive for 10 years, Ramsey told reporters he was eating McDonald’s when he saw her trying to leave the house.

As USA Today reports, people quickly began urging the hamburger chain to do something for the local hero. McDonald’s responded by sending out a tweet late Tuesday: “We salute the courage of Ohio kidnap victims & respect their privacy. Way to go Charles Ramsey — we’ll be in touch.”

As of late Wednesday, McDonald’s had not met with Ramsey. A McDonald’s spokesperson told ABC News on Wednesday that the company was planning to “reach out to Mr. Ramsey directly” without offering further details. “We saw an overwhelming response on Twitter calling on McDonald’s to do something,” spokesperson said. “As we committed, we will be in touch.”

In a world where nearly every social-media action brings a social-media reaction, some are applauding McDonald’s for acknowledging Ramsey’s role in the women’s escape, while others are criticizing the company for its tweet.

“I call it news-jacking,” says Chris Ann Goddard, president of CGPR. “They’re taking advantage of a situation to help their brand.”

Illustrating what’s happening to marketing in America, “The social-media folks all jump on something without asking: Is this a good idea?” says marketing strategist Al Ries. McDonald’s would have been wiser to do something for Ramsey without making a public splash of it, he says.

For now, the story should be about the three young women who were rescued, Ashley McCown, a crisis-communications specialist at the Boston firm of Solomon McCown, tells “The last thing you want is an organization seeking PR for the PR buzz and appearing self-promotional.”

Meanwhile, complicating matters are the reports that surfaced pointing out that Ramsey is a convicted felon with three separate domestic violence charges. As Time magazine business writer Brad Tuttle notes, “Perhaps, one might think, it’s unwise for a brand to want such a man as a spokesperson.”

Tuttle goes on to write that the Ramsey episode  “represents a cautionary tale for brands that are eager to take advantage of a hot marketing opportunity, before the public’s attention shifts elsewhere.” — Greg Beaubien

Related reading:

How Charles Ramsey, The NFL Draft And A Presidential Election Can Help You Land Your Next Big Media Hit, ComPRehension



Jenifer R. Daniels, APR says:

it's definitely 'news jacking' and not too tasteful. wonder who the single point of accountability is for this social media feed?

May 13, 2013

TM says:

My guess is that someone would have written a story if McDonald's didn't do anything. The fact that McDonald's answered their public and said they would reach out to Mr. Ramsey was respectful--they offered their sympathy to the women involved and thanked Mr. Ramsey for his heroic efforts. They left it at that and took the conversation offline by stating they will be in touch with him.

May 13, 2013

Linda Hamlin says:

A 140-character comment posted to an audience that follows your brand hardly feels like "news-jacking." In this instance, news jacking would have been a stop-drop-and-roll advertising campaign and flying a senior company official to Cleveland to give Ramsey a giant commemorative check while he stood in front of the crime scene. McDonald's could have gone nuts, but it didn't.

May 13, 2013

don bates says:

I'm thrilled the guy took action, but to make McDonalds part of the picture is inane. The next time I do something heroic, I'm going to say,"I was standing there wishing I was wearing a solid-gold Rolex and driving the latest, coolest Rolls Royce when out of nowhere...." I hope the media will run with their names and my wishes.

May 21, 2013

Post a Comment

Editor’s Note: Please limit your comments to the specific post. We reserve the right to omit any response that is not related to the article or that may be considered objectionable.


To help us ensure that you are a real human, please type the total number of circles that appear in the following images in the box below.

(image of seven circles) + (image of six circles) =