This Just In...

Bonus Online Article: Are PR Agency Valuations Worth the Time and Money?

February 6, 2015

[pw illustration/ikon images/corbis]
[pw illustration/ikon images/corbis]

Let’s say you’re in the market for a new home. What do you do? You hire a broker to determine the current marketplace.
   
You give the broker information such as where you’d like to live, what type of house you want, what amenities need to be within driving distance and what price range you can afford. The broker goes through his database and identifies a house that meets your criteria. The house is listed for $300,000. That’s the value that the seller and his broker put on the house. 

When you see the house, you’re excited. It’s exactly what you want. But you don’t think it’s worth $300,000. So you offer $250,000. The two brokers negotiate to see if there’s some middle ground, and when a phone call comes saying that the seller will accept $275,000, you’re elated. You have your dream house.
   
The same premise applies to selling a PR firm. However, our profession has a process used to help determine the appropriate value of a PR agency. It’s called “valuation.”

A process that CPAs usually carry out, valuation examines a long list of tangibles, as well as intangibles. It includes a detailed analysis of past and present financials, profitability and client stability. It also evaluates the caliber of key employees, as well as that magic ingredient known as goodwill.
   
Let’s say the founder of a $3 million consumer product firm finds out that his firm is worth $3.5 million through a formal process; that’s what he should get for the firm if he sells it. The PR agency owner will receive a bill from the CPA for a fee of $7,000 to $12,000 for conducting the valuation.
   
So just how “valuable” is this written valuation? This same PR agency owner decides to put his firm on the market. He deliberates whether he should sell to his own employees or to an outside organization, so he decides to test the waters.

He goes to three of his key employees and tells them that his agency has been valued at $3.5 million, and that he’d like to continue the legacy of the firm by selling it to them.
   
They are flattered, but after talking about it among themselves, they realize that they don’t have the means to shell out that kind of money. So they offer the owner $2 million to be paid over 20 years. 

The agency owner politely declines their counteroffer. After all, he’s got the official valuation document in his pocket.

Then, he turns to the marketplace. He meets several potential buyers and displays the valuation document. He determines that there shouldn’t be much in the way of negotiations because the value of his firm has been cast in stone.
   
One buyer offers him $2.8 million to be paid over three years.

“But you don’t understand,” the seller says to the prospective buyer. “I have a valuation and according to it, this firm is worth $3.5 million.”
   
The buyer responds, “No, you don’t understand. I’ve done my own evaluation of your firm, and my advisers and I don’t think it is worth anywhere near $3.5 million. We believe it’s worth $2.8 million.”
   
The seller declines the offer and has a conversation with another buyer who says, “I believe your firm is worth $4 million and I’m ready to do this deal.” Does the seller then say, “No, you don’t understand. This firm is valued at $3.5 million, and I simply can’t accept your offer of $4 million”?
   
No! The seller will simply toss the valuation into the dustbin of the restaurant where he’s celebrating the sale of his firm and forget all about.
 

A cost-effective valuation

My premise is simple. Don’t bother with a valuation. It’s not worth the expense. Just use the rule of thumb of how PR agency acquisitions are usually done. It’s a lot cheaper. In fact, it doesn’t cost anything at all.
   
If your agency has a net fee income of $3 million and a 15-to-20 percent profit after the owner pulls out all the perks, then the agency is worth about one times that net fee income — or $3 million. Or, it’s worth five times your EBITDA; the prevailing totals are usually the same.
   
The only “valuation” you need to have is common sense. If your agency does around  $3 million, then the base value will be around $3 million. If it has demonstrated rapid growth, and you are certain that the agency will double its size in three years, then the earn-out will take into account this rapid growth, and you will do considerably better than $3 million.
   
If your agency is stumbling at around $3 million, having made in excess of $4 million a year in net fee income the previous two years, then it may be valued at less than $3 million. But if the anticipated synergies take place between the seller and the buyer during the next few years and result in the seller experiencing a massive turnaround in net fee income and profits, then the seller could pocket more than $3 million after all.
   
You don’t need an expensive crystal ball, tealeaf reader or valuation to give you this information. It’s already there for you.

And I’ll put it to you another way. I’ve been doing mergers and acquisitions for 11 years now, and I’ve never had a buyer ask to see a valuation. The buyer will always use his own criteria to make a judgment as to what a PR agency is worth to him.
   
And if a seller shakes hands with a buyer to move a deal forward, then the marketplace will have done the valuation for you.

Art Stevens, APR, Fellow PRSA
Art Stevens, APR, Fellow PRSA, is managing partner of The Stevens Group and remains co-managing partner of SGP Worldwide, consultants to the PR agency profession, focusing on mergers, acquisitions and management consulting. Before that, he was founder and CEO of LobsenzStevens. He is a member of the PRSA College of Fellows, a past officer of the PRSA national board, past president of PRSA-NY and recipient of the PRSA Patrick Jackson Award for lifetime achievement. Details: theartstevensgroup.com

Comments

David A. Meeker, APR. Fellow PRSA says:

As Art suggests, the real value of a valuation is to the buyer, not the seller. The purchaser needs to know far more than the numbers. What is the nature of the accounts and the likelihood they will remain with the new owner? How certain can the buyer be about retaining key staff? Where does the account mix being acquired fit with the current accounts of the buyer? What is the prospect for growth of the new firm? While the handshake makes the deal, getting to know how the grip feels is the real challenge.

Feb. 17, 2015

Don Bates, APR, Fellow PRSA says:

Art, the readers of this article, especially seller agencies, deserve some clarification regarding valuations. To wit: --I don’t know of any public relations M&A consultant that charges $7K-$12K for a valuation. Gould+Partners, for example, charges $3.5K-$5K depending on the client’s need, and the valuation includes counseling time, an added benefit for the client. --Several methods (not one) are used to determine the “right” valuation for seller firms. Although based on similar criteria, the valuations reflect the specific needs of specific agencies in specific situations. --Valuations help seller firms get an honest handle on what they may be worth to prospective buyers. but they are a guide, not a guarantee. --Valuations go beyond a simple buyer/seller proposition. Valuations assist in addressing critical issues such as the buy-in or buy-out of partners, estate tax implications, areas of potential litigation, and fulfillment of employee stock ownership plans. --When done for buyers, valuations of sellers help to provide the basis for more reasonable offers, even though, as Dave Meeker suggests in his comment, additional questions and issues always come into play before a sale can be finalized. More to the point, valuations clearly have a place in the buyer/seller marketplace. They help buyers and sellers to consummate the best marriages. For sellers, in particular, valuations help to put their operational reality in perspective until they finally say “I do” to a suitor. Until then, they can use the valuations to help manage their goals and objectives for greater profitability and success so that when the day of selling arrives they will be able to contribute greater value to the buyer and realize a bigger payout as a result.

Feb. 25, 2015

George Rosenberg says:

Don you are quite right about the purpose and use of valuations. It seems strange that after all these years of "selling" valuations to his clients, Art suddenly decides that valuations have no benefit. Seems a little strange to me. I suggest to my agency clients that valuations play an important role in the "process" of getting ready to sell one's firm. I continue to believe in that.

Feb. 26, 2015

Lindsey Back, CFO says:

Having a formal valuation done was one of the most valuable things we did as an agency. We worked with Rick Gould to perform our valuation and he has since provided us with valuable counseling to advise us on what we should be doing to improve our value. The formal valuation report definitely gave us a clear baseline so we could understand our value and more effectively set goals and plan for the future. I feel that it is very important to have a formal valuation report and methodology to use, and update every couple of years, so conversations amongst owners and their CFO can carry more substance. I have also found it very helpful to use the formal valuation report during discussions with our attorney's, CPA's and insurance carriers when addressing our growth and future value.

March 6, 2015

Post a Comment

Editor’s Note: Please limit your comments to the specific post. We reserve the right to omit any response that is not related to the article or that may be considered objectionable.

Name:
Email:
Comment:
Validation:

To help us ensure that you are a real human, please type the total number of circles that appear in the following images in the box below.

(image of eight circles) + (image of eight circles) =